Coordinated Review with the University of Waterloo

Compliance Human Research Ethics Boards Information Board Deadlines and Timelines Submitting to Research Ethics Boards Research Ethics Board Fees Coordinated Review with the University of Waterloo Post-Approval Events WREM Contact Us Animal Research Animal Ethics and Care Research Integrity Controlled Substances Controlled Goods Research Safety Conflicts of Interest Funded Research Management

��ҹ��վ has established a coordinated review process for multi-site research that applies to collaborative research projects with the .

Researchers are to submit one human ethics application through (WREM), after which the office will inform Waterloo's REB of the requirement for a coordinated review. Each of the ethics review boards will work together to simultaneously review the application and provide coordinated comments. This change eliminates the need for consecutive human ethics reviews by each institution, reducing turnaround times for multi-site research. In the process, it reduces redundancies and ensures consistency of recommendations between institutions. All research, regardless of risk level, is eligible for the ��ҹ��վ-Waterloo process.

Researchers seeking ethics review from their home institutions are eligible to apply for a simultaneous coordinated review.
Researchers wishing to use this process are to contact their respective research ethics office/administrators for guidance on this process.
The ��ҹ��վ-Waterloo coordinated review process will continue to evolve over time as outlined in the Ethics Review Agreement between the two institutions.
Researchers submitting applications for the coordinated review process agree that all information provided, or later requested to provide, can be freely shared between the ethics committees.

How to Submit

Principal Investigator and Locally Responsible Investigator

The principal investigator (PI) is to contact his/her research ethics office/administrator to discuss the application being submitted for coordinated review.
At ��ҹ��վ, contact Erika Basile, Director, Research Ethics and Compliance; at Waterloo, contact Julie Joza, Senior Manager, Office of Research Ethics.
Administrators at each institution will then contact their counterparts to initiate coordinated ethics review.
All research conducted between Waterloo and ��ҹ��վ investigators requires a PI be named on the application, in addition to a locally responsible investigator at each institution.
- For example, if research is initiated by a ��ҹ��վ faculty member and conducted at Waterloo, the ��ҹ��վ faculty member is listed as PI on the application form; a Waterloo investigator is then listed as the locally responsible investigator. The PI may also be the locally responsible investigator for their home institution.

Application Forms

��ҹ��վ's application form, located in , will serve as the initial application form.
Waterloo investigators will also need to complete an within Waterloo’s online application system to ensure the application is assigned a number at Waterloo, and a file created.
Ethics clearance to begin research will be provided through one clearance notification certificate signed by both ��ҹ��վ and Waterloo research ethics committees.

Requests for Modifications/Amendments

Modifications or amendments to approved or active research studies reviewed through the coordinated review process will be reviewed using ��ҹ��վ's , found in WREM. Review of the modification/amendment will be coordinated by the PI’s home institution. Notification of research ethics clearance for a modification/amendment will be sent by both ethics committees.

Continuing Reviews/Renewals

Continuing reviews and renewals of active research projects that were reviewed through the coordinated review process must be submitted by the PI to both ethics committees using the required forms.

��ҹ��վ: , via WREM
Waterloo: (Form 105)

Reporting A Problem

Researchers must report all problems that occurred in the research, including:

Adverse events of research reviewed through the coordinated review process must follow the usual process for reporting adverse events, as outlined by each ethics committee. The PI is responsible for notifying his/her home institution and immediately following-up with the other ethics committee.

��ҹ��վ: , via WREM
Waterloo: A (Form 106)

Protocol deviations of research reviewed through the coordinated review process must follow the usual process for reporting protocol deviations, as outlined by each ethics committee. The PI is responsible for notifying his/her home institution and following-up with the other ethics committee.

��ҹ��վ: , via WREM
Waterloo: (Form 107)

Incidental findings or unanticipated problems associated with research reviewed through the coordinated review process must following the usual process for reporting unanticipated problems or incidental findings, as outlined by each ethics committee. The PI is responsible for notifying his/her home institution and following-up with the other ethics committee.

��ҹ��վ: , via WREM
Waterloo: (Form 108)

Closing a Completed Study

Completion of research reviewed through the coordinated review process must following the usual process for closing a study, as outlined by each ethics committee. The PI is responsible for notifying his/her home institution, then following-up with the other ethics committee.

��ҹ��վ: , via WREM
Waterloo: (Form 105)

Contact

��ҹ��վ: Erika Basile, Director, Research Ethics & Compliance, 519 661-2111 ext. 86764
Waterloo: Julie Joza, Senior Manager, Office of Research Ethics, 519-888-4567, ext. 38535

��ҹ����վ